Abstract

This paper explores the link between the introduction of fair value measurements (FVM) and the development of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2008-9. The paper aims to provide an historical analysis of the development of the Enron scandal with a focus on fair value accounting (FVA) and provides a narrative literature review of the subsequent economic downturn, its effect on the auditing profession and audit fees arrangements, implications for FVA, and response of global institutions and standard setters. It provides a theoretical explanation of the underlying antecedents using existing accounting theories. For each reviewed stream of research, the paper establishes the theoretical underpinning and discusses its application supported by the context. The content analysis using NVivo software was employed to analyse existing research and available published information. Based on the comprehensive literature review, the study arrives at two main findings. First, the paper concludes with the controversial use of FVM and establishes a direct connection between Enron’s collapse, the GFC, and improper FVM practices. Secondly, the study identifies the current pricing strategy for audit as an industry response to the abuse of external audit arrangements regarding FVA. Supported by the literature review findings, the paper contributes to the audit research by providing deep insights into the connection between FVA practices, the GFC and development of the audit profession. The paper addresses the lack of foundational research in FVA and establishes a solid background for further studies on FVA and audit profession development in general.

Highlights

  • During the period between 2008 - 2009, the world economy was shattered by a critical economic downturn and the collapse of well-developed stock markets (Menicucci & Paolucci, 2016)

  • This paper establishes the link between the introduction of guidance on fair value measurements (FVM) and the emergence of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the major implications of fair value accounting (FVA) practices on the audit profession

  • Through a comprehensive literature review, the paper contributes to FVA research by establishing the connection between management practices at Enron with a focus on FVA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the period between 2008 - 2009, the world economy was shattered by a critical economic downturn and the collapse of well-developed stock markets (Menicucci & Paolucci, 2016). FVA was enacted by International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) after releasing IAS 39 — fair value option in June 2005, to increase consistency and comparability in fair values. IAS 39 required entities to apply FVA following a three-level hierarchy (i.e. fair value level 1, level 2 and level 3 inputs) which was used in identifying the fair value for financial instruments. Additional disclosure requirements were enacted by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to explain the valuation techniques and the inputs used to conduct those measurements (IAS Plus, 2019). FVA allowed extensive discretion into management evaluations which meant higher risk and complexity in preparing and auditing fair values (Khlif & Achek, 2016; Watts, 2006)

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call