Abstract

In our Fair Plan 5 paper, we compared the CO2 emissions of the 80%-Emission-Reduction-By-2050 (80/50) Plan with the CO2 emissions of our Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate. We found that the 80/50 Plan reduced CO2 emissions more rapidly than necessary to achieve the principal objective of the Fair Plan: to keep Global Warming (GW) within the 2℃ (3.6℉) limit adopted by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) “to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system”. Here, we ask the “What If” question: “What would the GW of the 80/50 Plan be post 2100 if its CO2 emissions post 2100 were kept at their 2100 value?” We find that although the GW of the 80/50 Plan decreases slightly over part of the 21st century, it does not remain constant thereafter. Rather, the GW of the 80/50 Plan begins to increase in 2088, exceeds that of the Fair Plan beginning in 2230, exceeds the 2℃ (3.6℉) limit of the UNFCCC in 2596, and ends the millennium at 2.7℃ (4.8℉). Thus, not only does the 80/50 Plan phase out humanity’s CO2 emissions faster than necessary to fulfill the UNFCCC constraint, it also fails that constraint if its CO2 emissions post 2100 are kept at their 2100 value. Accordingly, we believe that the Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate is superior to the 80/50 Plan.

Highlights

  • In our Fair Plan 5 paper [1], we compared and contrasted the greenhouse-gas emissions of the 80%-EmissionReduction-By-2050 (80/50) Plan with both our Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate and a Reference case

  • The RCP-8.5 was developed at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis near Vienna, Austria, to be one of four emission scenarios developed for the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [7]

  • The Global Warming (GW) of the 80/50 Plan has not previously been examined beyond the 21st century. We have examined this for the “What If” scenario that the 80/50 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are continued beyond the 21st century at their values in 2100

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In our Fair Plan 5 paper [1], we compared and contrasted the greenhouse-gas emissions of the 80%-EmissionReduction-By-2050 (80/50) Plan with both our Fair Plan to Safeguard Earth’s Climate and a Reference case. Reference Case In our five earlier Fair Plan papers, FP1 - FP5 [1]-[5], we have taken the Reference Concentration Plan 8.5 (RCP-8.5) greenhouse gas (GHG) emission scenario [6] as our Reference case, which is the way the world would likely emit GHGs if either there were no consequent climate change or if we were completely ignorant thereof. The RCP-8.5 was developed at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis near Vienna, Austria, to be one of four emission scenarios developed for the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [7]. Trade-adjusted emissions mean the emissions incurred by country A to export goods and/or services to country B are debited to country B, not country A

Objective
Global Warming
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call