Abstract

Although both white lies and black lies are deceptive, white lies are typically seen as innocuous, legitimate, and even praiseworthy while black lies come across as selfish, malicious, and objectionable. These kinds of intuitive judgments become problematic, however, when white lies are selfishly motivated (e.g., when people ingratiate to get favorable treatment). We conducted three behavioral experiments to investigate the boundaries and connections between white and black lies. Study 1 showed that people who first told white lies were then more likely to tell black lies, whether their white lies were altruistic (only helping recipients) or Pareto (helping both recipients and themselves). In Study 2, half of the participants played a white lie game (Pareto or altruistic) first and then a black lie game and the other half played a black lie game and then a white lie game (Pareto or altruistic). The results suggested that telling white lies increased people’s likelihood of telling subsequent black lies but...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.