Abstract

<pre><span lang="EN-US">In the last five years, the number of investors who suit against host state in the international arbitration forum increased significantly. Almost all lawsuits used fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard which has been violated by the host state. Most of international investment agreements including those that were made by Indonesia contain FET standard clauses. However, there are no definitions related to this standard. This condition potentially raises a very wide interpretation of the standard. The problem formulations in this article are how the history of FET is, where its position in international investment law is and what elements of FET standard are. The results show that the FET standard has existed since Havana Charter followed by various FCN, BIT and other international investment agreements. FET standard can be categorized as customary international, legally binding on all countries regardless their national law. Although there is no universal approval regarding the scope of FET standard, the writings which have been published and the arbitral tribunal decision mentions that those elements are legitimate expectation; due process; denial of justice; rule of law; non-discrimination; transparency; consistency, good faith, and reasonableness.</span></pre><pre><span lang="EN-US"> </span></pre>

Highlights

  • In recent years, the number of lawsuits facing Indonesia in the international arbitration forum has increased significantly (Indonesia for Global Justice:2017: http://igj.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Akhir-dari-sengketaPerjanjian-Internasional.pdf)

  • In the case of Rafat Ali, Indonesia has been sued for violating Articles 4 and 2 (1) Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) of Indonesia-UK on fair and equitable treatment (FET) (ICSID Case No ARB/11/13):par

  • Many international investment agreements including BIT do not in any way define what is meant by the FET Standard

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The number of lawsuits facing Indonesia in the international arbitration forum has increased significantly (Indonesia for Global Justice:2017: http://igj.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Akhir-dari-sengketaPerjanjian-Internasional.pdf). In the case of Heslam Talaat, the plaintiff claimed that Indonesia violated the FET standard under the OIC agreement. Article 3 (2) BIT of Indonesian-Indian stipulates the following: (Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the Republic of India regarding the Increase and Protection of Investment: 1999: 3). Another example is Article 2 (2) of the BIT of Indonesia-Australia which stipulates: A party shall ensure fair and equitable treatment in its own territory to investment (Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and The Government of Australia concerning the promotion and protection of Investment:1992:4). What are the elements of FET standard used to see when the country is claimed to have violated the FET standard?

The History of FET Standard and Its Position in International Investment Law
CLOSING
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call