Abstract
In a CRT simulation of the “edge-substitution” paradigm [ Gilchrist (1988) Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 415–424], observers adjusted the apparent reflectance (lightness) of a test surface to match incremental or decremental standards. Matches suggested that two factors contributed to the observed failures of lightness constancy: (1) the interpretation of the scene in terms of illumination and reflectance edges and their corresponding integration, and (2) edge-enhancement (the “crispening” effect) due to the local surround.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
