Abstract
Poulton (1982) has criticized within-subject manipulations of the standard conditions for dual-task methodology. Two experiments compared between-versus within-subject designs employing lexical decisions. The results confirmed Poulton’s claim of asymmetry of transfer within repeated measure designs. Conclusions regarding attention allocation, therefore, are equivocal in comparison with independent groups designs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
