Abstract

Can inflating away nominal mortgage liabilities effectively combat recessions? I address this question using a model of illiquid housing, endogenous credit supply, and equilibrium default. I show that, in an ordinary recession, temporarily raising the inflation target has only modest or even counterproductive effects. However, during episodes like the Great Recession, inflation effectively boosts house prices, consumption, and dramatically cuts foreclosures, but only when fixed-rate mortgages are the dominant instrument. The quantitative implications of inflation also vary if other nominal rigidities or demand externalities are present. In the cross section, inflation delivers especially large gains to highly leveraged homeowners. (JEL D14, E31, E32, E52, G21, R31)

Highlights

  • In response to the unprecedented collapse in the housing market and macroeconomy during the Great Recession, the U.S government undertook dramatic interventions to pull the economy out of its slump

  • The interaction of endogenous credit constraints and housing illiquidity in this paper proves crucial to the efficacy of inflationary policies

  • Debt, deleveraging, and default remain issues of interest as the economy moves beyond the Great Recession

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In response to the unprecedented collapse in the housing market and macroeconomy during the Great Recession, the U.S government undertook dramatic interventions to pull the economy out of its slump. Inflation in this scenario boosts house prices (both nominal and real) and reduces foreclosures, but the contraction in mortgage supply causes consumption to initially fall before recovering.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call