Abstract

Even when a nurse knows that a physician will not alter the treatment plan, failure to communicate essential patient findings, or even a substantial delay may impose liability. Goff v. Doctor's General Hospital of San Jose is a classic case. A pregnant woman entered the hospital and delivered at 7:00 P.M. At 9:30 P.M., the evening nurse contacted the physician to inform him that the patient was bleeding too much. The physician responded that the amount of bleeding, as described, was not excessive. He instructed the nurse to determine excessive bleeding by checking the perineal pads at timed intervals. The nurse assessed the bleeding accordingly, but did not take any vital signs. Although she judged that the second perineal pad check seemed to indicate excessive saturation, she did not call the physician again because, as she later testified, he would not have come.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.