Abstract
With the aim to preserve deadlock freedom, we define a new refinement preorder for modal transition systems (MTSs), using an MTS-specific variant of testing inspired by De Nicola and Hennessy. We characterize this refinement with a kind of failure semantics and show that it “supports itself,” for example, in the sense of thoroughness—in contrast to standard modal refinements. We present a conjunction operator with respect to our new refinement, which is quite different from existing ones. It always returns an MTS—again in contrast to the case of modal refinement. Finally, we also consider De Nicola’s and Hennessy’s may- and must-testing, where the latter leads to a semantics that is also compositional for hiding.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
