Abstract

Clamped-single submodule (CSSM) has DC short circuit current protection function to improve the safety and stability of high voltage, direct current (HVDC) system. In order to carry out the protection, it needs an additional number of insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) and diodes compared to the conventional half-bridge submodule (HBSM). In general, the failure rate tends to increase in proportion to the number of circuit components. Also, complex operation of the submodule may increase the failure rate, so accurate reliability analysis considering these points is required to apply CSSM in a practical HVDC system. We estimate the failure rate and the mean time between failures (MTBF) of CSSM using a fault tree. Fault-tree analysis (FTA) is possible to analyze the failure rate more accurately than the prior part count failure analysis (PCA) that considers only the number of parts, the type of parts, and the connection status of each circuit component. To provide guidelines for submodule selection under various conditions, we compare the economic cost of a CSSM with HBSM, FBSM, and clamped-double submodule (CDSM), and analyze the failure rate according to the voltage margin of the parts.

Highlights

  • The insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) failure rate is calculated by OR-gate combination of bipolar junction transistor (BJT) and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) failure rate provided by MIL-HDBK-217F as given in (3) [24,25]

  • Adding DC short current protection improves reliability, reducing the failure rate compared to FBSM, but the failure rate is higher than half-bridge submodule (HBSM) due to the increased number of parts

  • clamped-single submodule (CSSM) needs an additional number of IGBTs and diodes than HBSM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Clamped-double submodule (CDSM) was introduced in [8] It adds one IGBT, two diodes, and a capacitor to the full-bridge structure. Was introduced to reduce the number of circuit components while suppressing the effects of DC short current through capacitors and diodes [10]. When the DC short current protection function is added, it has the effect of suppressing the increase of the failure rate due to the increase in the number of parts. We analyze the failure rate of CSSM that has a DC short current protection function but has a relatively small number of components. The failure rate according to the DC short current protection function of CSSM can be found by comparing the FTA results with the traditional PCA (part count analysis) results. This paper can serve as a guideline for selecting HVDC submodules by judging the reliability and economic cost of submodules employing DC short current protection

Clamped-Single Submodule
Normal Operation Mode at Connected to Converter
Normal Operation Mode at Disconnected to Converter
Abnormal Operation Mode
Design Consideration
Failure Rate Analysis of CSSM
Fault-Tree Design Considering Operational Risk
Calculation of Part Failure Rates Based on MIL-HDBK-217F
Failure Rate of IGBT
Failure Rate of Diode
Failure Rate of Capacitor
Comparison of Failure Rate by PCA and FTA
Comparison of Failure Rate with Other Submodules
Comparison of the Number of Circuit Components
Comparison of Voltage and Current Stress on the Switching Devices
Comparison of Failure Rate According to Voltage Margin
Economic Cost Analysis of CSSM and Comparison with Other Submodules
Cost Model of IGBT and Diode
Cost Model of Capacitor
Cost Comparison
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call