Abstract

Experimental evidence demonstrates that collagen cross-linking in bone tissue significantly influences its deformation and failure behavior yet difficulties exist in determining the independent biomechanical effects of collagen cross-linking using in vitro and in vivo experiments. The aim of this study is to use a nano-scale composite material model of mineral and collagen to determine the independent roles of enzymatic and non-enzymatic cross-linking on the mechanical behavior of a mineralized collagen fibril. Stress–strain curves were obtained under tensile loading conditions without any collagen cross-links, with only enzymatic cross-links (modeled by cross-linking the end terminal position of each collagen domain), or with only non-enzymatic cross-links (modeled by random placement of cross-links within the collagen–collagen interfaces). Our results show enzymatic collagen cross-links have minimal effect on the predicted stress–strain curve and produce a ductile material that fails through debonding of the mineral–collagen interface. Conversely, non-enzymatic cross-links significantly alter the predicted stress–strain response by inhibiting collagen sliding. This inhibition leads to greater load transfer to the mineral, which minimally affects the predicted stress, increases modulus and decreases post-yield strain and toughness. As a consequence the toughness of bone that has more non-enzymatically mediated collagen cross-links will be drastically reduced.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.