Abstract

Failure of hollow trees in urban areas is a worldwide concern, and it can be caused by different mechanisms, i.e. bending stresses or flattening-related failures. Here we derive a new analytical expression for predicting the bending moment for tangential cracking, and compare the breaking moment of various failure modes, including Brazier buckling, tangential cracking, shear failure and conventional bending failure, as a function of t/R ratio, where t and R are the trunk wall thickness and trunk radius, respectively, of a hollow tree. We use Taiwan red cypress as an example and show that its failure modes and the corresponding t/R ratios are: Brazier buckling (Mode I), tangential cracking followed by longitudinal splitting (Mode II) and conventional bending failure (Mode III) for 0 < t/R < 0.06, 0.06 < t/R < 0.27 and 0.27 < t/R < 1, respectively. The exact values of those ratios may vary within and among species, but the variation is much smaller than individual mechanical properties. Also, shear failure, another type of cracking due to maximum shear stress near the neutral axis of the tree trunk, is unlikely to occur since it requires much larger bending moments. Hence, we conclude that tangential cracking due to cross-sectional flattening, followed by longitudinal splitting, is dominant for hollow trunks. Our equations are applicable to analyse straight hollow tree trunks and plant stems, but are not applicable to those with side openings or those with only heart decay. Our findings provide insights for those managing trees in urban situations and those managing for conservation of hollow-dependent fauna in both urban and rural settings.

Highlights

  • Failure of hollow trees in urban areas is a worldwide concern, and it can be caused by different mechanisms, i.e. bending stresses or flattening-related failures

  • We use Taiwan red cypress as an example and show that its failure modes and the corresponding The critical ratios (t/R) ratios are: Brazier buckling (Mode I), tangential cracking followed by longitudinal splitting (Mode II) and conventional bending failure (Mode III) for 0 < t/R < 0.06, 0.06 < t/R < 0.27 and 0.27 < t/R < 1, respectively

  • Three dominant failure modes and their corresponding t/R ranges are determined as Brazier buckling (Mode I, 0 < t/R < 0.06), tangential cracking/longitudinal splitting (Mode II, 0.06 < t/R < 0.27) and conventional bending failure, i.e. compression failure on the compression side and tearing on the tension side (Mode III, 0.27 < t/R < 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Failure of hollow trees in urban areas is a worldwide concern, and it can be caused by different mechanisms, i.e. bending stresses or flattening-related failures. The exact values of those ratios may vary within and among species, but the variation is much smaller than individual mechanical properties Shear failure, another type of cracking due to maximum shear stress near the neutral axis of the tree trunk, is unlikely to occur since it requires much larger bending moments. There is discrepancy between the VTA field observations and the critical trunk wall thickness for failure predicted by classic bending theory, which assumes that the cross section does not ovalize More factors such as tangential cracking and orthotropic material properties must be taken into consideration. Failure begins with fibre buckling on the compression side, followed by fibre tearing on the tension side In this case, the shape of the cross section may remain almost unchanged until failure occurs, and classic bending theory can be used to calculate the bending strength of long, hollow trunks. Direct calculation of the moments is convenient in assessing the stability of thin-walled hollow trunks, which is appealing from both safety and conservation perspectives

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call