Abstract

BackgroundThe diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) relies on symptom-based criteria. A valid and reliable biomarker that could confirm the diagnosis is desirable. This study evaluated the properties of faecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) as diagnostic biomarkers for IBS.MethodsTwenty-five subjects with IBS and 25 controls were included in this explanatory case–control study. Stool samples were analysed for SCFA (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, isobutyric acid, valeric acid, and isovaleric acid) with gas chromatography and reported as mmol/l and molar%. In the search for the best way to distinguish between subjects with and without IBS, the total amount and the amount of each of the SCFA were measured, and the proportions and differences between the SCFA were calculated.ResultsIn the IBS and control group, the mean age was 46.2 (SD 12.9) and 49.2 (SD 14.6), and the number of females was 13/25 (52 %) and 15/25 (60 %) respectively. The difference between propionic and butyric acid (mmol/l) had the best diagnostic properties, the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was 0.89 (95 % CI: 0.80–0.98) (p < 0.001). With a cut-off value > 0.015 mmol/l indicating IBS, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 92 %, 72 %, 3.29, 0.11 and 29.6 respectively. Similar diagnostic properties were shown for all the IBS subgroups.ConclusionsThe study indicated that faecal SCFA could be a non-invasive, valid and reliable biomarker for the differentiation of healthy subjects from subjects with IBS.

Highlights

  • The diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) relies on symptom-based criteria

  • No patients were excluded from the study due to an organic disorder that could explain the IBS-like symptoms, and none used antibiotics

  • This study indicated that faecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) could be a valuable diagnostic biomarker for IBS

Read more

Summary

Methods

Design This study was an add-on to a previous study comparing patients with depression and unspecified neurological symptoms [18, 19]. Participants In the previous study, patients above 17 years of age with the diagnosis of idiopathic depression (according to ICD-10; F 32–34 spectre) were included in the “depression group”. Patients admitted to an inpatient neurological clinic with unexplained neurological symptoms were included in the “neurological group”. In both groups, organic diseases were excluded after comprehensive clinical, laboratory, and supplementary investigations according to the doctors’ discretion. II (BDI II) (minimal, mild, moderate and severe depression; scores 0–13, 14–19, 20–28 and 29–63 respectively) [20]. Written informed consent was given by all participants before inclusion

Results
Background
Discussion
Strengths and limitations
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call