Abstract

The apparent shape of the Sun is controversial1: Dicke and Goldenberg2 measured a Sun with an oblateness (equatorial minus polar radius divided by polar radius) of 5 × 10−5, whereas Hill and Stebbins measured a value of 0.9 × 10−5, consistent with a slowly rotating core. More recently, Claverie et al.3 have found the Sun's interior may be rotating faster than the surface after all. Dicke and Goldenberg's observations were questioned by Chapman and Ingersoll4 on the basis that facular influences could introduce a signal which appeared similar to the solar oblateness signal both in shape and magnitude. Dicke5 analysed the data in many different ways (such as dividing the data on the basis of facular brightness, and different window size) and concluded that the faculae did not contribute significantly. We reexamine this question by means of more general facular contrast models. We find that the faculae can contribute a signal which has a time dependence similar to the Dicke and Goldenberg oblateness signal, and which for a facular contrast within the range of acceptable values allows an acceptable fit to the oblateness measurements.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.