Abstract

ABSTRACTWithin the current climate of budget cuts and funding reforms, evaluation and evidence-based practice is high on the agenda for art therapists as we seek to demonstrate the strengths of art therapy, what it does well and what it does differently. When clients drop out of groups, there is a valuable opportunity to explore barriers to therapeutic engagement, and to learn more about what art therapy provides by identifying what is being avoided. The findings of two art therapy pilot surveys are presented here to further understanding in these areas. The first aimed to understand why some veterans did not attend all the art therapy groups during a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) programme, to inform service development. The second was to test feedback about the benefits of art therapy. The surveys were conducted at Combat Stress, a mental health service provider for veterans. They proved to be useful for gathering data, testing ideas and generating evidence of participants’ experience of art therapy to share with service commissioners and to inform further research. Findings suggest that many participants were able to overcome avoidance and discovered unexpected benefits. Art therapy stimulated new ways of thinking, which helped to promote therapeutic engagement.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.