Factors of Engagement in Research After Graduation from EP Fellowship: an HRS Survey

Abstract

The declining number of electrophysiologists pursuing academic research careers could negatively impact innovation for patients with heart rhythm disorders in the coming decades. To explore determinants of research engagement after graduation from EP fellowship programs and evaluate associated barriers and opportunities. A mixed methods survey of EP fellows and early career electrophysiologists was conducted, drawing from Heart Rhythm Society members. The survey encompassed 20 questions on demographics, research involvement, perceived research barriers, and perspectives on research time and opportunities. Responses were analyzed with robust Poisson regression. Among 259 respondents, those with dedicated research blocks during their fellowship had a significantly higher interest in future research (RR 1.15, p=0.04). The number of peer-reviewed publications modestly influenced interest in continued research (RR 1.0034 per publication, p < 0.0001), but there was no relationship to gender or race. Educational resources, networking opportunities, mentorship, funding, and protected time to enhance research engagement were important themes in the qualitative analysis, while key barriers to post-fellowship research were lack of mentorship, insufficient resources and time constraints in that order, particular with respect to women in research. Notably, no significant differences in barriers were observed between community training programs and academic centers. Research experience and mentorship during EP fellowship were key determinants of subsequent research success after training, with similar findings by sex and race. These findings explain how fellowship training influences a physician's research practice post training and highlights opportunities to modify EP fellowships and augment research retention.