Abstract

To investigate the accuracy and biases of predicted lung shunt fraction (LSF) and lung dose (LD) calculations via 99m Tc-macro-aggregated albumin (99m Tc-MAA) planar imaging for treatment planning of 90 Y-microsphere radioembolization. LSFs in 52 planning and LDs in 44 treatment procedures were retrospectively calculated, in consecutive radioembolization patients over a 2 year interval, using 99m Tc-MAA planar and SPECT/CT imaging. For each procedure, multiple planar LSFs and LDs were calculated using different: (1) contours, (2) views, (3) liver 99m Tc-MAA shine-through compensations, and (4) lung mass estimations. The accuracy of each planar-based LSF and LD methodology was determined by calculating the median (range) absolute difference from SPECT/CT-based LSF and LD values, which have been demonstrated in phantom and patient studies to more accurately and reliably quantify the true LSF and LD values. Standard-of-care LSF using geometric mean of lung and liver contours had median (range) absolute over-estimation of 4.4 percentage points (pp) (0.9 to 11.9 pp) from SPECT/CT LSF. Using anterior views only decreased LSF errors (2.4 pp median, -1.1 to +5.7 pp range). Planar LD over-estimations decreased when using single-view versus geometric-mean LSF (1.3vs. 2.6Gy median and 7.2vs. 18.5Gy maximum using 1000g lung mass) but increased when using patient-specific versus standard-man lung mass (2.4vs. 1.3Gy median and 11.8vs. 7.2Gy maximum using single-view LSF). Calculating planar LSF from lung and liver contours of a single view and planar LD using that same LSF and 1000g lung mass was found to improve accuracy and minimize bias in planar lung dosimetry.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.