Abstract

This study explores and identifies the investment criteria used by South African venture capitalists in their venture screening and evaluation processes. Using a Likert scale type of questionnaire, South African venture capitalists (VCs) were asked to rate the investment criteria identified in similar studies abroad and to report any additional criteria of their own. By evaluating the mean ratings, it was found that South African VCs consider the entrepreneur’s honesty and integrity; a good expected market acceptance; and a high internal rate of return (IRR), to be the three most important criteria. The South African VCs, just like their overseas counterparts, regard management considerations to be the most important criteria group in the evaluation of new investment projects. The results of this study are deemed useful to both venture capitalists in their decision-making process and to entrepreneurs in their venture capital applications to maximise their success rate.

Highlights

  • Venture capital is a major source of funding for the entrepreneurial community and usually focuses on early stage, more risk-orientated, pre-initial public-offering business endeavours

  • This study explores and identifies the investment criteria used by South African venture capitalists in their venture screening and evaluation processes and compares these criteria with the results obtained in similar studies abroad

  • By identifying the criteria that are deemed as important, venture capitalists can enhance their decision-making processes and entrepreneurs can adjust their preparations for venture capital applications to maximise their success rates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Venture capital is a major source of funding for the entrepreneurial community and usually focuses on early stage, more risk-orientated, pre-initial public-offering business endeavours. Entrepreneurs usually start and run on a shoestring budget and will seek venture capital once they are in a position to expand their businesses. The importance of investment decision criteria becomes obvious with the fact that most venture capital firms are operated by a lean staff and that they are inundated with proposals that become a significant bottleneck in their operations (Larsson & Roosvall 2000:21). This will have an effect on productivity since much of their time will be spent evaluating and rejecting flawed proposals (MacMillan, Siegel and Subba Narasimha, 1985).

Review of related literature
Investment decision criteria
The South African venture capital industry
Data and methodology
Limitations
Analysis of investment decision criteria
Friedman Test
The most important criteria
The least important criteria
Findings
Conclusion and recommendations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.