Abstract

Structural sorting maps using $\frac{{R}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}{{R}_{\ensuremath{\pi}}}$, $\frac{{r}_{+}}{{r}_{\ensuremath{-}}}$, $\frac{{r}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{A}}{{r}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{B}}$, and $\frac{{\ensuremath{\chi}}^{A}}{{\ensuremath{\chi}}^{B}}$ are compared for $\mathrm{AB}$, $A{B}_{2}$ octets and double octets, and $A{B}_{2}{X}_{4}$ spinels. With the use of $\frac{{r}_{+}}{{r}_{\ensuremath{-}}}$, the crystal ionic radii, the sorting is tolerable only if the usual restrictions of the mechanical model (radius ratio rules) are relaxed. $\frac{{R}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}{{R}_{\ensuremath{\pi}}}$ are poor indices for $A{B}_{2}$ and $A{B}_{2}{X}_{4}$, but $\frac{{r}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{A}}{{r}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{B}}$ and $\frac{{\ensuremath{\chi}}^{A}}{{\ensuremath{\chi}}^{B}}$ are excellent for all three systems. It is suggested that the traditional packing ideas based on size (and viewed semiquantitatively here using the ${r}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{\ensuremath{\xi}}$) are directly related to modern charge-control aspects (via electronegativity differences) of molecular structures, and both can be viewed as very important factors in determining structural preference.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call