Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems provide services essential to human health and economies. Therefore, resource management programs aim to ensure the sustainable flow of these services. Stakeholder engagement is often a critical tool in learning what services are of priority to the public and may be integral to the success of aquatic ecosystem management because public participation in planning and decision making can generate broader support, e.g., financial, intellectual, and labor, for the management plan. The collection of such information may even be statutorily mandated, such as in the Clean Water Act of the United States, which requires that water bodies be classified for the beneficial uses, e.g., fisheries, drinking water, or recreation, they provide. Past evaluations of stakeholder engagement with aquatic ecosystems have considered a wide range of factors influencing engagement. We conducted a critical review of the literature on characteristics of stakeholders and characteristics of the environment that influence stakeholder engagement and participation with aquatic ecosystems. Our objective was to identify factors that should be considered in the creation of surveys to help encourage the inclusion of ecological and social beneficial uses data in large-scale water monitoring programs. Factors identified in our review were, extent and influence of place-based knowledge; proximity to, and frequency of visitation of the resource(s) being considered; basic demographics such as age, gender, education, and income; home community type; aesthetic appeal of the resource; and primary reason for engagement with the resource. We propose these factors, with subfactors, as a template for survey development.

Highlights

  • In the United States, information from water quality testing, e.g., National Aquatic Resource Surveys (U.S Environmental Protection Agency 2016a), tracking, e.g., National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (U.S Environmental Protection Agency 2017), and modeling, e.g., Index of Watershed Integrity (Flotemersch et al 2016, Thornbrugh et al 2018) is used to report comprehensive information on the condition of water bodies throughout the country

  • The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, i.e., Clean Water Act (U.S Congress 1972), a benchmark for instream value protection in the U.S, requires that water bodies be classified for the type of beneficial water uses they are to support, e.g., fisheries, drinking water, or recreation

  • The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (i.e., Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§1251-1387) requires that water bodies be classified for the type of beneficial water uses they are to support, e.g., fisheries, drinking water, recreation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the United States, information from water quality testing, e.g., National Aquatic Resource Surveys (U.S Environmental Protection Agency 2016a), tracking, e.g., National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (U.S Environmental Protection Agency 2017), and modeling, e.g., Index of Watershed Integrity (Flotemersch et al 2016, Thornbrugh et al 2018) is used to report comprehensive information on the condition of water bodies throughout the country. Watershed management actions have maximized the production of one ecosystem service, e.g., energy or agriculture production, at the expense of other services, e.g., water quantity and quality, that may be of equal or even greater relevance (Musters et al 1998, Vermeulen and Koziell 2002, Gordon et al 2010) To minimize such outcomes, Hobbs et al (2014) suggest that an explicit framework that includes and responds to social needs and values, in addition to environmental considerations, be used to increase management success by more fully considering the range of services and beneficial uses supported by the environment. This information would aid in the understanding of how trade-offs impact groups differently, (López-Santiago et al 2014) helping the exploration of more socially acceptable management options and staving off conflict (Ives and Kendal 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call