Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe national practice patterns of hysterectomy type performed with concurrent sacrocolpopexy and determine clinical factors associated with surgical route. We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database with hysterectomy data for this retrospective cohort study. We identified sacrocolpopexy cases from 2014 to 2016 with concurrent hysterectomy and stratified patients into supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) or total hysterectomy (TH). As a secondary analysis, we compared the laparoscopic subset of cases. We performed χ2 and backward stepwise logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with hysterectomy type and compare complication rates. A total of 4,615 women underwent SCP with hysterectomy: 55.8% TH and 44.2% SCH. Mean ± SD age was 56.5 ± 11.7 years. Gynecologists represent 96.3% of surgeons; 51.2% were urogynecologists. Urogynecologists were more likely than generalists to perform SCH (58.4% vs 41.6%, P < 0.001). Total hysterectomy was associated with younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.98 per year [0.97-0.99]), greater uterine weight (aOR, 1.05 per 10 g [1.03-1.06]), and non-Caucasian race (aOR, 0.73 [0.58-0.92]). Complication rates were equivalent between hysterectomy type (SCH, 6.2% vs TH, 6.2%; P = 0.956). Laparoscopy was used for 84.4% of surgical procedures. In this subgroup, TH was associated with greater uterine weight (aOR, 1.06 per 10 g [1.04-1.08]) and younger age (aOR, 0.97 per year [0.96-0.98]). Complication rates were similar (SCH, 5.1% vs TH, 5.0%; P = 0.824). At the time of sacrocolpopexy, TH is more common than SCH and is associated with younger age and greater uterine weight, although urogynecologists more commonly perform SCH. The overall risk of complications was low and similar between hysterectomy type.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.