Abstract

BackgroundEthnic and socio‐economic inequalities have been reported in the uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This study aimed to explore the factors affecting CRC screening participation in an ethnically and socio‐economically diverse inner city population.MethodsSemi‐structured interviews were undertaken with 50 people aged 55–74 years, recruited from GP practices in south‐east London. Participants were from Black African (n=13), Black Caribbean (n=15), White British (n=17), Black other (n=2) and White other (n=3) backgrounds. Participants' socio‐economic status (SES) was assessed using a combined measure of educational attainment, housing tenure and car ownership. Participants' SES varied although there were more participants from less deprived backgrounds than those from more deprived backgrounds. The interview topic guide was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis.FindingsLack of awareness of CRC screening was a barrier for all participants. There were also some notable group differences by ethnicity and SES. Cancer fear was a barrier for White British participants of varying SES. Misunderstanding instructions for completing the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) was a barrier for people of low SES regardless of ethnicity. For Black African and Black Caribbean participants, of any SES, religious faith and a perceived civic duty to participate in screening encouraged participation.Discussion and conclusionsThis is the first study to provide detailed information on the separate views of Black African and Black Caribbean participants about screening. Consideration of ethnicity and SES together also allowed us to identify pertinent barriers for particular groups that can be targeted to improve access to screening for those who wish to take part.

Highlights

  • The UK national screening programme for colorectal cancer (CRC) was established in 2006 to enable the early detection of CRC in males and females aged between 60 and 74 years

  • CRC screening differs from the pre-­existing breast and cervical cancer screening programmes in that it is the first UK mass screening programme to include both men and women and guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) completion is undertaken by individuals themselves

  • The CRC screening programme has significantly evolved since this study was conducted, our findings have provided an important contribution to understanding screening participation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The UK national screening programme for CRC was established in 2006 to enable the early detection of CRC in males and females aged between 60 and 74 years. Uptake of many forms of screening varies according to the individuals’ socio-­economic status (SES) or ethnicity and colorectal cancer screening is no different. SES may affect screening uptake by many pathways, which are comprehensively discussed by von Wagner and et al.[3] One potential pathway is that people with lower SES experience more frequent life stressors but have fewer resources to cope with them. This may lead to greater pessimism about the future, including expecting screening to be unpleasant and the consequences of being diagnosed with cancer as worse. Consideration of ethnicity and SES together allowed us to identify pertinent barriers for particular groups that can be targeted to improve access to screening for those who wish to take part

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.