Abstract

Master data refers to the data that represents the core business of the organization, shared among different applications, departments, and organizations and most valued as the important asset to the organization. Despite the outward benefit of master data mainly in decision making and organization performance, the quality of master data is at risk. This is due to the critical challenges in managing master data quality the organization may expose. Hence the primary aim of this study is to identify factors influencing master data quality from the lens of total quality management while adopting the systematic literature review method. The study proposed 19 factors that inhibit the quality of master data namely data governance, information system, data quality policy and standard, data quality assessment, integration, continuous improvement, teamwork, data quality vision and strategy, understanding of the systems and data quality, data architecture management, personnel competency, top management support, business driver, legislation, information security management, training, change management, customer focus, and data supplier management that can be categorized to five components which are organizational, managerial, stakeholder, technological, and external. Another important finding is the identification of the differences for factors influencing master data compared to other data domain which are business driver, organizational structure, organizational culture, performance evaluation and rewards, evaluate cost/benefit tradeoffs, physical environment, risk management, storage management, usage of data, internal control, input control, staff participation, middle management's commitment, the role of data quality and data quality manager, audit, and personnel relation. It is expected that the findings of this study will contribute to a deeper understanding of the factors that will lead to an improved master data quality.

Highlights

  • The evolution of digital transformation and a data-driven economy requires the formulation of new strategies to ensure the organization stays relevant and competitive

  • According to [1], 80% of companies acknowledged the impact of poor master data quality to be high or very high for their performance, 82% of the company engaged in data quality initiative but not using the systematic or established method and only 15% of the companies know the established method for improving master data quality

  • The analyses suggested a total of 19 factors are relevant in the context of master data quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The evolution of digital transformation and a data-driven economy requires the formulation of new strategies to ensure the organization stays relevant and competitive. Taking into account that data is an important element for every organization [2]–[4], the massive amount of data that are created and stored in response to digitalization possess new challenges in the management of data quality. The organization is normally held responsible to manage a few types of data namely master data, transaction data, and reference data, to name a few. Typical master data classes are supplier, customer, material, product, employee, and asset [7]–[9]. In the public sector context, master data composed of data about service providers, customers, and services or products offered [10]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.