Abstract
This study investigates the factors that constrain and promote the selection of noun compound types in spoken and written Hebrew: Construct-state (e.g. anfey∧ha-ets ‘branches∧tree’, where ∧ stands for the bound genitive relation); analytic (e.g. ha-anafim šel ha-ets ‘the-branches of the-tree’, with the free genitive particle šel); and double anaf-av šel ha-ets ‘branches-its of the-tree’ with two genitive markers: a bound suffix and šel. Three types of data were examined, one spoken and two written (journalistic and school textbooks). Lexical, semantic, syntactic and pragmatic analyses revealed that construct-state compounds are the default form for expressing classifying relations, while analytic compounds typically denote possessive and partitive relations. Syntactic complexity promotes the selection of analytic compounds in written language owing to their relative transparency. Double compounds are the most marked of the three, and are very restricted owing to the close relationship between a bounded adjunct and its head. Implications of these findings for language acquisition and the development of literacy are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.