Abstract
Introduction. The real situation in the economic, political and educational spheres hinders the development of intellectual and professional resources of technical intelligentsia. The purpose of the study is to identify objective conditions and subjective factors that determine the labor activity of modern Russian technical intelligentsia as a personnel basis for socio-economic changes and innovative transformations in the country. Materials and Methods. Official statistics and legislative acts were used as the materials for an analysis of the objective conditions. The methodological principles of historicism and socio-historical continuity, the methods of mathematical statistics were applied. When interpreting subjective factors, the empirical data obtained using the methods of the mass survey “Modernization of the Economy and Technical Intelligentsia” and the expert survey “Innovative Activity of Technical Intelligentsia” were examined. The surveys made it possible to reveal technical intelligentsia’s opinion – an assessment of current events in terms of adaptation to market relations and crises of recent years, job satisfaction, material remuneration for one’s work, value orientations. Results. The study made it possible to identify the objective conditions (the economic situation of the country, the state of institutions of education, etc.) and the subjective factors (the degree and level of labor adaptation of technical intelligentsia to the ongoing socio-economic transformations of recent decades, job satisfaction, etc.) that characterize modern Russian technical intelligentsia. The performed analysis of these conditions and factors indicates the difficulties for implementing a large-scale innovative breakthrough both in Russia’s economy and society as a whole. Discussion and Conclusion. Modern objective conditions determining the development of technical intelligentsia do not contribute to the completion of its traditional social mission – to be the pillar of scientific, technological and innovative transformations. The article is of practical importance for government agencies at various levels, for public organizations working to improve policies in the field of innovation in industry, science and education. Empirical data can be used for further scientific interpretations, as well as for diagnostics and advice on targeted support to enterprises and organizations in the productive sector.
Highlights
International experience shows that social innovation is an important tool for regional development, this type of innovation is a relatively new phenomenon for Russia
Its key factor is innovation, which, in turn, is determined by the availability of sufficient amount of human capital, it being a set of knowledge, skills and abilities, including the ability of a person to generate ideas, create innovations, and bring them to production
The theoretical foundations of the study include the works of Russian and foreign academic economists, generalization and critical analysis of which made it possible to show the indirect impact of human capital on sustainable development
Summary
The factors in the liquidation orientation of the institution of insolvency in the Russian Federation, as well as the trends in the increase in duration of insolvency proceedings with a minimum number of satisfied creditor claims have been identified; counterarguments have been presented regarding the alleged low efficiency of trustees in bankruptcy; arguments concerning the annual increase in the workload of trustees in bankruptcy have been statistically supported. 126 Федерального закона «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)»); б) препятствование проведению инвентаризации; в) обжалование результатов оценки, обращение в арбитражный суд с заявлениями о разрешении разногласий в части порядка реализации имущества должника; г) включение аффилированных лиц в реестр требований кредиторов должника с целью аккумулирования большинства голосов для контроля над процедурой; д) попытки приостановления торгов, оспаривание результатов торгов, жалобы в Федеральную антимонопольную службу Российской Федерации; е) жалобы на действия арбитражного управляющего, давление на него посредством подачи жалоб в Управление Росреестра с целью отстранения от процедуры или же полной дисквалификации управляющего; ‒ величина и разнородность конкурсной массы, что приводит к необходимости организации нескольких длительных процедур торгов; ‒ комплексный и ресурсозатратный характер деятельности арбитражного управляющего по оспариванию подозрительных сделок должника с последующей реализацией возвращенных в конкурсную массу активов или прав требования к третьим лицам; ‒ юридической работой по привлечению к субсидиарной ответственности контролирующих лиц должника. Результаты исследования представляют интерес для арбитражных управляющих, специалистов, сопровождающих процедуры банкротства, а также студентов факультетов экономического и юридического профилей, поскольку включают в себя не только обширный статистический анализ эффективности института несостоятельности в его действующем состоянии, но и сравнительный анализ законопроекта изменений в Федеральный закон «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)» с точки зрения профессионального положения арбитражных управляющих.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
