Abstract
This paper reviews various ways of reducing the exposure of pension funds and annuity providers to longevity risk. Based on this review, the prospects for capital market solutions by the private sector are assessed. The paper identifies a number of key obstacles to explain why a large-scale private-sector driven market in longevity products is unlikely to develop in the near future. Using these findings, the paper considers central public policy with regard to whether the government can play a significant capital market role in overcoming these hindrances. The paper argues that this public policy role is hampered by the fact that governments themselves are already exposed to significant longevity risk. This means that issuing longevity-indexed government bonds (LIBs) would further increase their current exposure. Against this backdrop, the issuance criteria commonly used by public debt managers for launching new instruments such as LIBs are identified. On this basis, the paper concludes that the prospects for a successful, large-scale market in LIBs do not seem favourable at this stage. It is also doubtful whether relatively small government issues of LIBs would suffice to create a benchmark around which large-scale capital-market solutions by the private sector could develop.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.