Abstract
BackgroundRacial/ethnic disparities in rates of influenza vaccinations in the US remain an issue even among those with access, no out-of-pocket costs, and after adjusting for confounders. We used an approach called the Oaxaca-Blinder (OB) decomposition method to ascertain the contribution of covariates individually and in aggregate to the racial disparity in influenza vaccination.MethodsWe included members > = 18 years of age as of 05/01/2014 with continuous enrollment through 04/30/2015. Influenza vaccination was defined by diagnosis, procedure, or medication codes, or documentation in the immunization table. Characteristics were reported by race. Logistic regression models estimated the odds of vaccination associated with: (1) race; and (2) covariates stratified by race. The Oaxaca-Blinder (OB) method calculated the contribution of covariates to the difference or disparity in vaccination between Blacks and Whites.ResultsWe found that among adults, 44% were vaccinated; 55% were Black; and 45% were White. Black members have 42% lower odds of vaccination than White members. The contribution of the differences in the average value of the study covariates between Black and White members (the OB covariate effect) accounted for 29% of the racial disparity. The contributions to the total White-Black disparity in vaccination included: age (16%), neighborhood median income (11%), and registration on the online patient portal (13%). The contribution of the differences in how the covariates impact vaccination (OB coefficient effect) accounted for 71% of the disparity in vaccination between Blacks and Whites.ConclusionIn conclusion, equalizing average covariate values in Blacks and Whites could reduce the racial disparity in influenza vaccination by 29%. For health system vaccine campaigns, improving registration on the patient portal may be a target component of an effective system-level strategy to reduce racial disparities in vaccination. Additional information on patient-centered factors could further improve the value of the OB approach.
Highlights
Influenza spreads in a yearly outbreak, resulting in three to five million cases of severe illness and about 250,000 to 500,000 deaths globally [1], and an annual average of 41,400 deaths in the U.S [2] Influenza occurs with an annual attack rate of 5%–10% in adults [1, 3] and can result in hospitalization and death mainly among high-risk groups such as older persons, young children, persons with certain health conditions, and pregnant women [4]
Equalizing average covariate values in Blacks and Whites could reduce the racial disparity in influenza vaccination by 29%
The purpose of this study was to examine whether the difference in the proportion of patients vaccinated at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States (KPMAS) between Whites and Blacks can be explained by the distribution and the impact of a comprehensive list of pre-specified covariates
Summary
Influenza spreads in a yearly outbreak, resulting in three to five million cases of severe illness and about 250,000 to 500,000 deaths globally [1], and an annual average of 41,400 deaths in the U.S [2] Influenza occurs with an annual attack rate of 5%–10% in adults [1, 3] and can result in hospitalization and death mainly among high-risk groups such as older persons, young children, persons with certain health conditions, and pregnant women [4]. KPMAS has made annual influenza vaccination a priority initiative to prevent illness with a vaccination program consisting of no-referral flu vaccination clinics in all medical centers from September through late December; no copays; and a widespread education campaign. Despite these efforts, racial disparities in vaccination at KPMAS persist. We used an approach called the Oaxaca-Blinder (OB) decomposition method to ascertain the contribution of covariates individually and in aggregate to the racial disparity in influenza vaccination.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.