Abstract

PurposeCochlear implantation can restore access to sound and speech understanding in subjects with substantial hearing loss. The Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3) measures the impact of an intervention on the patient’s quality of life and is sensitive to changes in hearing. In the current study we used factor analysis to predict a clinically important gain in HUI3 scores in adult cochlear implant recipients.MethodsData were collected in an observational study for 137 adult recipients from a single center who had at least 1-year HUI3 follow-up. Demographic and other baseline parameters were retrospectively analyzed for their association with a clinically important HUI3 scale gain, defined as at least 0.1 points. Data were also collected for the speech spatial qualities (SSQ) scale.ResultsBaseline telephone use and HUI3 hearing, speech and emotion attribute levels were significantly associated with clinically important gains in HUI3 scores. However, SSQ scores increased significantly with or without clinically important HUI3 gains.ConclusionThose subjects who were unhappy or experienced difficulties communicating with strangers or in a group were twice as likely to obtain a clinically important gain in health utility compared to those who were happy or had less difficulty communicating. Subjects who were unable to use the telephone prior to cochlear implantation were one and a half times more likely to obtain a clinically important gain. The SSQ scale was more sensitive to hearing improvements due to cochlear implantation. An inability to use the telephone is an easy to assess biomarker for candidacy for cochlear implantation.

Highlights

  • The success of a healthcare intervention is often measured by its impact on the patient’s quality of life

  • A statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in Health Utility Index 3 (HUI3) multi-attribute scores from baseline was seen for the group at year 1, which was maintained at years 2 and 3 (Fig. 1, left)

  • After cochlear implantation there was a statistically significant group gain in HUI3 scores at 1 year which was maintained at years 2 and 3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The success of a healthcare intervention is often measured by its impact on the patient’s quality of life. Only the HUI3 is sensitive to changes in hearing and is recommended as the questionnaire of choice for studies evaluating hearing treatments [7,8,9] These generic measures are not as sensitive to perceived changes in hearing as many of the conditionspecific measures available, e.g., the Speech Spatial Hearing questionnaire [10]. They provide a measure of the overall benefit to a recipient’s quality of life and are used in the cost-effectiveness analysis which informs many funding bodies who make decisions on healthcare provision [2, 11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call