Abstract

PurposeThere is little research-based documentation on the services provided by drug information centres (DICs). The aim of this multi-centre study was to explore for the first time the factors associated with time consumption when answering drug-related queries at eight different but comparable DICs.MethodsDuring an 8-week period, staff members at eight Scandinavian DICs recorded the number of minutes during which they responded to queries. Mixed model linear regression analyses were used to explore the factors associated with time consumption when answering queries.ResultsThe mean time consumption per query was 178 min (range 4–2540 min). The mean time consumed per query increased by 28 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 23 to 33, p < 0.001) min higher for queries for which there was a lack of documentation and 139 (95 % CI 74 to 203, p < 0.001) min higher when conflicting information was present in the literature. Staff members with less than 1 year of experience consumed a mean of 91 more minutes (95 % CI 32 to 150, p = 0.003) per query than staff members with more than 2 years of experience.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the large variation in time consumed answering queries posed to Scandinavian DICs. The results highlight the need for highly competent staff members and easy access to drug information sources. Further studies are required to explore the association between time consumption and response quality.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-014-1749-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Drug information centres (DICs) vary with regard to affiliation, staff competence and working methods [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • The mean time consumed per query increased by 28 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 23 to 33, p

  • This study demonstrates the large variation in time consumed answering queries posed to Scandinavian drug information centres (DICs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drug information centres (DICs) vary with regard to affiliation (pharmacies, universities, university hospitals), staff competence (pharmacists and/or physicians) and working methods (i.e. providing solely factual drug information or providing clinical decision support) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The Scandinavian DICs share important features [2,3,4, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. They are, to varying degrees, affiliated with clinical pharmacology departments at university hospitals. The working process of these centres has been described previously [2,3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call