Abstract

Objective : to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of maintenance treatment in the absence of progression after 16 weeks of first-line therapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colon cancer. Materials and methods . We have analyzed medical case histories of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who underwent treatment in the department of clinical pharmacology and chemotherapy of N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center from 2007 to 2015 years. Inclusion criteria were the following: 16–24 weeks of first-line chemotherapy with no signs of progression and the inability to perform metastasectomy. Progression-free survival was the main criterion for effectiveness in our study. Results. 160 (44.5 %) of 359 treated patients met the inclusion criteria. 102 (63.7 %) patients were followed up, while the other 58 (36.3 % – comparison group) patients underwent maintenance chemotherapy. Grade I–II toxic reactions and grade III complications associated with first-line chemotherapy were insignificantly more common in the group of patients left on maintenance chemotherapy: 72.4 % and 37.9 % versus 57.8 % and 24.5 % in the comparison group, p = 0.07 and p = 0.07 respectively. The frequency of grade I–II toxic reactions and grade III complications in the second-line treatment did not differ between treatment groups (p = 0.9 and p = 0.8). The median of progression-free survival in observation group and comparison group was 4, and 6 months (odds ratio (OR) 0.6; p = 0.009), and life expectancy – 23 and 31 months (OR 0.75; p = 0.1), respectively. Statistically significant differences between groups with respect to achieving the objective response and/or normalization of carcinoembryonic antigen level were revealed: median of progression-free survival was 13 (n = 26 of 57; 45.6 %) and 4 months (n = 31 of 57, 54.4 %), respectively (HR 0.38; p = 0.002), median of life expectancy – 34 months versus 26 months (OR 0.37; p = 0.3). Conclusions . Carrying out maintenance therapy is associated with increased incidence of grade III complications during the first-line treatment, but does not affect the tolerability of the second-line treatment. Supportive chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines remains to be the most effective in patients with favorable prognostic factors such as normalization of carcinoembryonic antigen and/or achievement of the objective response on the background of first-line chemotherapy.

Highlights

  • Progression-free survival was the main criterion for effectiveness in our study

  • Grade I–II toxic reactions and grade III complications associated with first-line chemotherapy were insignificantly more common in the group of patients left on maintenance chemotherapy: 72.4 % and 37.9 % versus 57.8 % and 24.5 % in the comparison group, p = 0.07 and p = 0.07 respectively

  • The frequency of grade I–II toxic reactions and grade III complications in the second-line treatment did not differ between treatment groups (p = 0.9 and p = 0.8)

Read more

Summary

Обзор литературы

Целью нашей работы явилась оценка переносимости и эффективности проведения поддерживающей терапии при отсутствии прогрессирования после 16 нед 1-й линии терапии у больных метастатическим неоперабельным раком толстой кишки. Критериями включения больных в анализ явились: проведение 16–24 нед химиотерапии 1-й линии без признаков прогрессирования и невозможность выполнения метастазэктомии. Критериями включения больных в группе с наблюдением чаще выполнялось удаление в анализ являлись проведение ХТ 1-й линии в течение первичной опухоли, резекция метастазов в анамнезе, 16–24 нед без признаков прогрессирования и невоз- реже встречались пациенты с поражением метастазами можность вы­полнения метастазэктомии. Медиана ВБП осложнения III степени тяжести в виде ладонно-подо- в группах наблюдения и поддерживающей терапии швенного синдрома и у 1 (1,7 %) – повышение уровня составила 4 и 6 мес (отношение рисков (ОР) 0,6; 95 %. При сравнении прогностических групп медиана ВБП составила 6 и 4 мес в группе благо-

Благоприятный прогноз Неблагоприятный прогноз
При однофакторном анализе в нашем исследовании
Findings
Нет Бевацизумаб

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.