Abstract

Street-involved people with limited access to regular healthcare have an increased risk of developing oral cancer and a lower survival rate. The objective of this study was to measure the prevalence of oral cancerous/precancerous lesions and determine their associated risk factors in a high-risk, underserved population. In this cross-sectional study, English-speaking adults aged 18 years and older living in a marginalized community in Edmonton were recruited from four non-profit charitable organizations. Data were collected through visual oral examinations and a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and logistic regressions were applied. In total, 322 participants with a mean (SD) age of 49.3 (13.5) years completed the study. Among them, 71.1% were male, 48.1% were aboriginal, and 88.2% were single. The prevalence of oral cancerous lesions was 2.4%, which was higher than the recorded prevalence in Canada (0.014–1.42: 10,000) and in Alberta (0.011–1.13: 10,000). The clinical examinations indicated that 176 (54.7%) participants had clinical inflammatory changes in their oral mucosa. There was a significant association between clinical inflammatory oral lesions and oral cancerous/precancerous lesions (p < 0.001). Simple logistic regression showed that the risk of the presence of oral cancerous/precancerous lesions was two times higher in participants living in a shelter or on the street than in those living alone (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.15–3.82; p-value: 0.021). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the risk of oral cancerous/precancerous lesions was 1.68 times higher in participants living in a shelter or on the street vs. living alone after accounting for multiple predictors (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.19–2.37; p-value: 0.022). The results demonstrated a high prevalence of cancerous/precancerous lesions among the study participants, which was significantly associated with clinical inflammatory oral lesions. The evidence supports the need for developing oral cancer screening and oral health promotion strategies in underserved communities.

Highlights

  • Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada; Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Abstract: Street-involved people with limited access to regular healthcare have an increased risk of developing oral cancer and a lower survival rate

  • The risk of presence of oral cancerous/precancerous lesions was two times higher in participants living in a shelter/on the street than those living alone (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.15–3.82; p-value: 0.021)

  • 1.5% for cancerous lesions in our study is anticipated to increase to 2.4%, because 5% of the 55 cases of precancerous lesions are expected to transform into a malignancy [23,24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The objective of this study was to measure the prevalence of oral cancerous/precancerous lesions and determine their associated risk factors in a high-risk, underserved population. Simple logistic regression showed that the risk of the presence of oral cancerous/precancerous lesions was two times higher in participants living in a shelter or on the street than in those living alone (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.15–3.82; p-value: 0.021). The results demonstrated a high prevalence of cancerous/precancerous lesions among the study participants, which was significantly associated with clinical inflammatory oral lesions. Most oral precancerous and early cancerous lesions are symptomless, resulting in the pursuit of medical attention at advanced stages and leading to a poor prognosis and low survival rate [3] This is an unfortunate outcome considering that high-risk precancerous lesions are detected by a visual examination of the mouth. Leukoplakia (white changes), erythroplakia (red changes), and erythroleukoplakia (a combination of white and red changes) represent the most common oral precancerous lesions, defined as clinical white/red patches that cannot be rubbed off and clinically cannot be characterized for any diseases [5]

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call