Abstract

Bystander cardiopulmonary dresuscitation (CPR) improves the survival and neurological outcomes of sudden cardiac arrest patients. The rate of bystander CPR is increasing; however, its performance quality has not been evaluated in detail. In this study, emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in the field evaluated bystander CPR quality, and we aimed to investigate the association between bystander information and CPR quality. This retrospective cohort study was based on data included in the Smart Advanced Life Support (SALS) registry between January 2016 and December 2017. We included patients older than 18 years who experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to medical causes. Bystander CPR quality was judged to be “high” when the hand positions were appropriate and when compression rates of at least 100/min and compression depths of at least 5 cm were achieved. Among 6,769 eligible patients, 3,799 (58.7%) received bystander CPR, and 6% of bystanders performed high-quality CPR. After adjustment, the occurrence of cardiac arrest at home (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% confidence interval (CI); 0.42, 0.27–0.64), witnessed cardiac arrest (1.45, 1.03–2.06), and younger bystander age all showed associations with one another. High-quality CPR led to a 4.29-fold increase in the chance of neurological recovery. In particular, high-quality CPR in patients aged 60 years showed a significant association compared with other age groups (7.61, 1.41–41.04). The main factor affecting CPR quality in this study was the age of the bystander, and older bystanders found it more difficult to maintain CPR quality. To improve the quality of bystander CPR, training among older bystanders should be the focus.

Highlights

  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a serious public health problem worldwide due to a high incidence and low survival rates [1, 2]. e role of the bystander is very important for improving survival

  • Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in the field evaluated bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality, and we aimed to investigate the association between bystander information and CPR quality

  • General Patient Characteristics. ere were 149 cases (6.0%) involving high-quality CPR. e number of highquality CPR cases was higher for male patients (n 115, 77.2%) (p 0.005) and younger patients (p < 0.001). e number of lower quality CPR cases was significantly higher in patients with hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, or heart disease

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a serious public health problem worldwide due to a high incidence and low survival rates [1, 2]. e role of the bystander is very important for improving survival. E role of the bystander is very important for improving survival. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves the survival and neurological outcomes of victims with sudden cardiac arrest [3,4,5]. Many studies have indicated the Emergency Medicine International importance of CPR quality. Gallagher et al reported no difference in survival between cardiac arrest (CA) patients without adequate chest compressions and no chest compressions [7]. According to Yu et al, the quality of chest compression is a more important determinant of successful resuscitation than defibrillation or rapidity of chest compression [8]. The performance quality of bystander CPR has not been studied adequately. It is difficult to objectively evaluate the quality of bystander CPR in the field. There was no uniform format for evaluating these activities

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call