Abstract

We investigated the factors facilitating co-occurrence of two large carnivores, tigers (Panthera tigris) and common leopards (Panthera pardus), within a human-dominated landscape. We estimated their density and population size using camera-trap photographs and examined spatial segregation of habitats, temporal activity pattern, and diets in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. A Bayesian spatially-explicit capture-recapture model estimated densities of 3.2–4.6 (3.94 ± 0.37) tigers and 2.6–4.1 (3.31 ± 0.4) leopards per 100 km2 with abundance of 70–102 tigers and 66–105 leopards. Tigers occupied the prime habitats (grasslands and riverine forests) in alluvial floodplains of the Park whereas leopards appeared in Sal forests and marginal areas where livestock are present. Both tigers and leopards showed crepuscular activity patterns with a high overlap but tigers were less active during the day compared to leopards. Leopards’ activity in the day increased in the presence of tigers. Tiger and leopard diet overlapped considerably (90%). Compared to leopards, tigers consumed a higher proportion of the large prey and a smaller proportion of livestock. Our study demonstrates that sympatric large carnivores can coexist in high densities in prey rich areas that contain a mosaics of habitats. To increase the resilience and size of the Chitwan carnivore population, strategies are needed to increase prey biomass and prevent livestock depredation in adjacent forests. Long-term monitoring is also required to obtain a detailed understanding of the interaction between the large carnivores and their effects on local communities living in forest fringes within the landscape.

Highlights

  • Large carnivores have a relatively greater influence on the community structure through resource facilitation and trophic cascades, they remain in low densities naturally due to energetic constraints (Ripple et al 2014; Schmitz et al 2000)

  • Paleontological and molecular studies suggest leopards evolved in Africa and dispersed to Asia ca. 2 million years ago whereas tigers are endemic to Asia; they appear in the fossil record ca. 1.5 million years ago (Turner and Anton 1997; Lovari et al 2015)

  • Tiger distribution was positively related to the habitats in the river floodplain and prey, but were negatively related to the disturbance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large carnivores have a relatively greater influence on the community structure through resource facilitation and trophic cascades, they remain in low densities naturally due to energetic constraints (Ripple et al 2014; Schmitz et al 2000). They are threatened globally by habitat fragmentation and loss, poaching and illegal trade for their body parts, declining prey and conflict with humans (Karanth and Chellam 2009). 1.5 million years ago (Turner and Anton 1997; Lovari et al 2015) Both are obligate meat-eaters and solitary hunters. They differ in body size; an adult tiger (65–306 kg) is approximately four times the body weight of adult leopard (28–90 kg) (Seidensticker 1976)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call