Abstract
Neonates weighing less than 2.5 kg with aortic coarctation are challenging. We sought to find the prevalence of death or aortic arch reintervention and their determinants after coarctation repair. We also sought to define growth trajectories for postrepair aortic arch dimensions and identify factors associated with accelerated longitudinal growth. We reviewed neonates weighing less than 2.5 kg undergoing coarctation repair between 1993 and 2004. Competing-risks methods determined time-related prevalences of death, arch reintervention, and survival without subsequent reintervention. Mixed regression analysis modeled longitudinal growth trajectories of echocardiographically derived aortic arch dimensions. Thirty-six neonates underwent coarctation repair. Initial repair type was simple end to end (n = 3), extended end to end (n = 16), subclavian flap aortoplasty (n = 15), and patch aortoplasty (n = 2). Median initial repair age was 11 days (range 2-69 days) and mean weight was 2.01 +/- 0.33 kg. Overall 1-year survival was 76%. After 1 year from initial repair, 19% had died without subsequent reintervention, 14% underwent arch reintervention, and 67% remained alive without arch reintervention. Neonates with extended end-to-end repairs had increased transverse aortic arch Z-scores (P = .004). Although patients with larger initial transverse aortic arch Z-scores had higher scores across all time points (P < .001), neonates with the smallest transverse aortic arch Z-scores had accelerated growth trajectories (P < .001). Aortic isthmus growth was likewise accelerated in neonates with the smallest initial aortic isthmus Z-score (P < .001). Mortality and arch reintervention are common after initial repair of coarctation of the aorta in neonates weighing less than 2.5 kg. Catch-up growth of both the transverse arch and isthmus occurs after coarctation repair, especially in those with the smallest arch parameters, and may be increased by using an extended end-to-end technique.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.