Abstract

ContextVegetable production is highly dependent on chemical fertilisers and pesticides, but the intensive use of these inputs negatively impacts the environment and human health. Ecological Intensification (EI) has the potential to counter the adverse effects of agricultural intensification and improve sustainability. Despite the potential benefits of EI for the environment, the adoption rate of EI in vegetable production is low. Moreover, most studies on EI adoption focus on implementing a single farming practice or a single production stage. ObjectiveThis article aims to empirically analyse what factors influence the simultaneous adoption of various EI practices in different vegetable crop production stages by farmers in the context of an emerging economy such as Chile. Further, since the literature on EI practices adoption mainly analyses these factors as separate from each other, we aim to explore the interactions between factors and how these jointly impact the application of EI practices. MethodsWe collected data via a survey to vegetable growers in the central zone in Chile. First, we measure EI practices adoption through a farm-level index that reflects the sustainability of farming practices in five production stages. Second, we identify which factors affect EI practices adoption through multiple linear regressions. Third, based on the results of the previous steps, we carried out a literature review to see how the factors predicting the adoption of EI could interact. This analysis was performed using structural equation modelling. Results and conclusionsOur results show that being a woman, receiving training on EI practices, and being pro-environment positively affect EI practices adoption. Contrarily, obstacles include the perception of risk and barriers, better access to credit and higher income from farm activities, all of which negatively affect EI practices adoption. With reference to the interaction amongst the factors, we found that economic resources, trust and training are the major factors affecting the perception of risk and barriers amongst Chilean farmers when it comes to adopting EI practices. SignificanceEmbracing a broad perspective, including different farming practices and production stages, allowed us to offer insights into the complex processes of adopting EI practices. Identifying which factors are important and how these factors interact with each other, contributes to the debate on whatpolicymakers and scholars need to focus in order to increase the use rate of EI practices.

Highlights

  • Agricultural Intensification (AI) is characterised by the intensive use of agrochemicals and monocultures (Tscharntke et al, 2005)

  • This article aims to analyse which factors influence the simultaneous adoption of various ecological intensification (EI) practices in different vegetable production stages, by farmers in an emerging economy such as Chile

  • We organise the results of the paper into the following steps: 1) descriptive results, where we present an overview of the farmers sur­ veyed summarising the information of the farm practices, farmer char­ acteristics, network, knowledge and farm management; 2) factors affecting EI practices adoption, where we present the factors that predict the adoption of EI practices in each stage of production; and 3) exploring interactions amongst variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agricultural Intensification (AI) is characterised by the intensive use of agrochemicals and monocultures (Tscharntke et al, 2005). AI has multiple detrimental consequences for ecosystems such as biodiversity loss (Plue et al, 2018), reduction of environmental quality (Canovas et al, 2018), soil degradation (Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014) and adverse social and cultural effects (Horlings and Marsden, 2011). EI embraces the complexity of the rural landscape and local man­ agement interventions (Bommarco et al, 2013); EI includes concepts such as agroecology and organic, bio-diverse and restorative agriculture These concepts differ in the degree they internalise diversity, ecosystem services, social movements among other elements. They share the principles of biodiversity and natural regulation (Tittonell, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.