Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically alter the knee flexion at contact as runners land from running off of a platform and to document how this angle affects both the impact force and impact acceleration. The platform was used for its similarity to downhill running. Participants: Five male and five female participants volunteered to complete ten trials in each of four conditions. Interventions: Normal running (NR), normal running off a raised platform (NRP), flexed knee running off a raised platform (FRP), and extended knee running off a raised platform (ERP). Main outcome measurements: Kinematic data, ground reaction forces, leg and head acceleration data were collected. Results: Running off a raised platform increased peak impact forces (NR: 1147±171N; NRP: 1826±352N), peak leg accelerations (NR: 7.6±5.3g’s; NRP: 13.9±5.8g’s) and peak head accelerations (NR: 1.4±0.4g’s; NRP: 4.0±1.4g’s). Flexed knee running off the raised platform decreased peak impact forces to 1672±463N but increased peak impact leg accelerations to 16.3±5.7g’s compared to NRP. In contrast, extended knee running off the raised platform increased peak impact forces to 2111±515N but peak leg accelerations did not change 13.5±4.7g’s when compared to NRP. Conclusions: These results suggest that knee flexion decreased the mass that was being accelerated. This decreased mass was easier to accelerate and

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call