Abstract

BackgroundEntomopathogenic fungi have shown great potential for the control of adult malaria vectors. However, their ability to control aquatic stages of anopheline vectors remains largely unexplored. Therefore, how larval characteristics (Anopheles species, age and larval density), fungus (species and concentration) and environmental effects (exposure duration and food availability) influence larval mortality caused by fungus, was studied.MethodsLaboratory bioassays were performed on the larval stages of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi with spores of two fungus species, Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana. For various larval and fungal characteristics and environmental effects the time to death was determined and survival curves established. These curves were compared by Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyses.ResultsBeauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae caused high mortality of An. gambiae and An. stephensi larvae. However, Beauveria bassiana was less effective (Hazard ratio (HR) <1) compared to Metarhizium anisopliae. Anopheles stephensi and An. gambiae were equally susceptible to each fungus. Older larvae were less likely to die than young larvae (HR < 1). The effect of increase in fungus concentration on larval mortality was influenced by spore clumping. One day exposure to fungal spores was found to be equally effective as seven days exposure. In different exposure time treatments 0 - 4.9% of the total larvae, exposed to fungus, showed infection at either the pupal or adult stage. Mortality rate increased with increasing larval density and amount of available food.ConclusionsThis study shows that both fungus species have potential to kill mosquitoes in the larval stage, and that mortality rate depends on fungus species itself, larval stage targeted, larval density and amount of nutrients available to the larvae. Increasing the concentration of fungal spores or reducing the exposure time to spores did not show a proportional increase and decrease in mortality rate, respectively, because the spores clumped together. As a result spores did not provide uniform coverage over space and time. It is, therefore, necessary to develop a formulation that allows the spores to spread over the water surface. Apart from formulation appropriate delivery methods are also necessary to avoid exposing non-target organisms to fungus.

Highlights

  • Entomopathogenic fungi have shown great potential for the control of adult malaria vectors

  • This was done by comparing the mortality of early (L1-2, 1-3 days old) and late (L3-4, 4-8 days old) larval stages of An. stephensi and An. gambiae caused by different concentrations of M. anisopliae or B. sphaericus (Bs). bassiana spores

  • As the values were not significant in any case, the results show that An. stephensi and An. gambiae are susceptible to both fungi at both early and late larval stage (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Entomopathogenic fungi have shown great potential for the control of adult malaria vectors. Their ability to control aquatic stages of anopheline vectors remains largely unexplored. The entomopathogenic characteristic of Metarhizium anisopliae was identified more than 125 years ago while that of Beauveria bassiana was noted even earlier, in 1835 [14]. These entomopathogens belong to a group of anamorphic fungi called Hyphomycetes, which reproduce by spores (conidia) [15]. Farenhorst et al showed how water storage pots can serve as a suitable site for delivering a fungal infection to resting adult mosquitoes [27,28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call