Abstract

Due to the large numbers of transcription factors (TFs) and cell types, querying binding profiles of all valid TF/cell type pairs is not experimentally feasible. To address this issue, we developed a convolutional-recurrent neural network model, called FactorNet, to computationally impute the missing binding data. FactorNet trains on binding data from reference cell types to make predictions on testing cell types by leveraging a variety of features, including genomic sequences, genome annotations, gene expression, and signal data, such as DNase I cleavage. FactorNet implements several convenient strategies to reduce runtime and memory consumption. By visualizing the neural network models, we can interpret how the model predicts binding. We also investigate the variables that affect cross-cell type accuracy, and offer suggestions to improve upon this field. Our method ranked among the top teams in the ENCODE-DREAM in vivo Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction Challenge, achieving first place on six of the 13 final round evaluation TF/cell type pairs, the most of any competing team. The FactorNet source code is publicly available, allowing users to reproduce our methodology from the ENCODE-DREAM Challenge.

Highlights

  • Due to the large numbers of transcription factors (TFs) and cell types, querying binding profiles of all TF/cell type pairs is not experimentally feasible, owing to constraints in time and resources

  • We investigate the variables that affect cross-cell type predictive performance to explain why the model performs better on some TF/cell types than others, and offer insights to improve upon this field

  • Final rankings in the Challenge are based on performances over 13 TF/cell type pairs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the large numbers of transcription factors (TFs) and cell types, querying binding profiles of all TF/cell type pairs is not experimentally feasible, owing to constraints in time and resources. With FactorNet, a researcher can perform a single sequencing assay, such as DNase-seq, on a cell type and computationally impute dozens of TF binding profiles. These methods require a collection of motifs and DNase-seq data to predict TF binding sites in a single tissue or cell type.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call