Abstract
Construct validity of assessment center (AC) dimensions has long been scrutinized. Although ACs remain some of the best predictors of job performance, their construct validity repeatedly falls short. We examined construct validity of two rating formats within a developmental AC (DAC). Within-exercise ratings loaded onto their exercises, while the within-dimension rating factors represented multiple dimensions. Our findings suggest that dimensions within ACs exist, but AC designers must be aware of how to structure the rating process to enable the raters to accurately observe these dimensions. This is particularly important for DACs, where dimensions serve an important role.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
