Abstract
The two forms of the Australian Sex-role Scale developed by Antill, Cunningham, Russell, and Thompson (1981) were administered to 164 male and 131 female Australian high school students. Principal axis factor analyses yielded six factors on Form A and six on Form B. These factors did not reflect the six sub-scales. Moreover, the differing factor structure did not support the original authors' claim that the two forms are parallel lists. Further analyses using mean scale scores, scale intercorrelations and coefficients alpha showed some agreements and disagreements with previous studies on the scale's characteristics. Evidence for the factorial complexity of the scale, and suggestions for further refinement, particularly with the social desirability and masculine negative scales, were presented.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.