Abstract
The construct validity of the K-ABC was investigated by comparing 40 non-referred children's performance on the test with their performances on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, Preschool Language Scale, Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test, the Communication domain of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, and the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. A principal axis factor analysis with Varimax rotation of three-, four-, and five-factor solutions was performed. Results provided weak support for the K-ABC as a measure of simultaneous and sequential processing; an alternative interpretation of present results was suggested.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
