Abstract
Left-hemisphere stroke patients suffering from speech and language disorders are often able to sing entire pieces of text fluently. This finding has inspired a number of music-based rehabilitation programs, most notable among them a treatment known as Melodic Intonation Therapy (Albert et al., 1973). According to the inventors of the treatment, singing should promote a transfer of language function from left frontotemporal neural networks to their preserved right-hemisphere homologues. Although singing indeed engages right frontotemporal areas (Callan et al., 2006; Ozdemir et al., 2006), it does not seem to induce a transfer of language function from the left to the right hemisphere (Belin et al., 1996; Jungblut et al., 2014). Nonetheless, several studies confirmed the promising role of singing (Mills, 1904; Gerstmann, 1964; Keith and Aronson, 1975; Tomaino, 2010) and the overall efficacy of Melodic Intonation Therapy (Van der Meulen et al., 2014). Using an analytic research approach, two recent experiments explored whether singing, rhythmic pacing, and lyric type have an immediate effect on syllable production (Stahl et al., 2011) or a lasting effect on some aspects of speech and language recovery (Stahl et al., 2013). Contrary to earlier reports, the results did not indicate a short- or long-term advantage of singing over rhythmic speech in persons with non-fluent aphasia and apraxia of speech. Rather, the results revealed that lyric type may be of great importance. Conversational speech formulas—such as “good morning,” “everything alright?” or “I'm fine”—yielded higher rates of correctly produced syllables than novel word sequences, whether they were sung or rhythmically spoken. Moreover, the sung and the spoken training of a few selected speech formulas proved to facilitate the production of these phrases. We readily acknowledge that increasing the variety of phrases may lead to generalized effects in therapy, while singing in syllable-timed languages such as French possibly adds to the level of rhythmicity in a particular way (cf. Schmidt-Kassow et al., 2011; Zumbansen et al., 2014). Still, this does not fully explain the range of seemingly contradictory findings in the literature. In our opinion paper, we would like to address three issues in current research on singing and aphasia: articulatory tempo, clinical research designs, and formulaic language resources. We believe that these issues may account for some of the major discrepancies between past reports.
Highlights
Left-hemisphere stroke patients suffering from speech and language disorders are often able to sing entire pieces of text fluently
Using an analytic research approach, two recent experiments explored whether singing, rhythmic pacing, and lyric type have an immediate effect on syllable production (Stahl et al, 2011) or a lasting effect on some aspects of speech and language recovery (Stahl et al, 2013)
We readily acknowledge that increasing the variety of phrases may lead to generalized effects in therapy, while singing in syllable-timed languages such as French possibly adds to the level of rhythmicity in a particular way
Summary
Left-hemisphere stroke patients suffering from speech and language disorders are often able to sing entire pieces of text fluently. One may conclude that choral singing facilitates word production in aphasic patients. Using a similar research design, but controlling for articulatory tempo, a later study did not confirm an effect of choral singing over choral speech in 17 patients (Stahl et al, 2011).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have