Abstract

Plants with simple architecture and strong constraints on their growth may offer critical insights into how growth strategies affect the tolerance of plants to herbivory. Although Dioscorea praehensilis, a wild yam of African forests, is perennial, both aerial apparatus and tuber are annually renewed. Each year, the tuber produces a single stem that climbs from the ground to the forest canopy. This stem bears no leaves and no branches until it reaches optimal light conditions. Once in the canopy, the plant's production fuels the filling of a new tuber before the plant dies back to the ground. We hypothesized that if deprived of ant defense, the leafless growth phase is a vulnerable part of the cycle, during which a small amount of herbivory entails a high cost in terms of loss of opportunity. We compared the growth of stems bearing ants or not as well as of intact stems and stems subjected to simulated or natural herbivory. Ants reduce herbivory; herbivory delays arrival to the canopy and shortens the season of production. Artificially prolonging the stem growth to the canopy increased plant mortality in the following year and, in surviving plants, reduced the stem diameter and likely the underground reserves produced. Tuber size is a key variable in plant performance as it affects both the size of the aerial apparatus and the duration of its single season of production. Aerial apparatus and tuber are thus locked into a cycle of reciprocal annual renewal. Costs due to loss of opportunity may play a major role in plant tolerance to herbivory, especially when architectural constraints interact with ecological conditions to shape the plant's growth strategy.

Highlights

  • The relationships between growth and defense are a focal point in many theories of plant defense, the diversity of plant growth strategies is not yet well integrated into this body of theory

  • Much interest has centered on how allocation of resources to defense affects the plant’s intrinsic potential for growth, and on how growth rate affects tolerance to herbivory (Herms & Mattson, 1992; Strauss & Agrawal, 1999)

  • Research has focused on how the plant organizes its growth in space and time, and on the consequences of this growth strategy in limiting or responding to herbivory (Boege & Marquis, 2005; Marquis, 1996; Stowe, Marquis, Hochwender, & Simms, 2000; Strauss & Agrawal, 1999)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relationships between growth and defense are a focal point in many theories of plant defense, the diversity of plant growth strategies is not yet well integrated into this body of theory. Research has focused on how the plant organizes its growth in space and time, and on the consequences of this growth strategy in limiting or responding to herbivory (Boege & Marquis, 2005; Marquis, 1996; Stowe, Marquis, Hochwender, & Simms, 2000; Strauss & Agrawal, 1999). The cost of herbivory varies, among different plant parts (Marquis, 1992a) and for the same plant part.

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.