Abstract

BackgroundHealth systems play key roles in identifying tobacco users and providing evidence-based care to help them quit. Health systems change – changes to health care processes, policies and financing – has potential to build capacity within these systems to address tobacco use. In 2010, ClearWay MinnesotaSM piloted a health systems change funding initiative, providing resources and technical assistance to four health care systems. This paper presents findings from a process evaluation, describing key stakeholders’ views on whether changes to how health systems treat tobacco use resulted from this initiative and what may have facilitated those changes.MethodsA process evaluation was conducted by an independent evaluation firm. A qualitative case study approach provided understanding of systems change efforts. Interviews were conducted with key informants representing the health systems, funder and technical assistance providers. Core documents were reviewed and compared to thematic analysis from the interviews. Results were triangulated with existing literature to check for convergence or divergence. A cross-case analysis of the findings was conducted in which themes were compared and contrasted.ResultsAll systems created and implemented well-defined written tobacco use screening, documentation and treatment referral protocols for every patient at every visit. Three implemented systematic follow-up procedures for patients referred to treatment, and three also implemented changes to electronic health records systems to facilitate screening, referral and reporting. Fax referral to quitline services was implemented or enhanced by two systems. Elements that facilitated successful systems changes included capitalizing on environmental changes, ensuring participation and support at all organizational levels, using technology, establishing ongoing training and continuous quality improvement mechanisms and leveraging external funding and technical assistance.ConclusionsThis evaluation demonstrates that health systems can implement substantial changes to facilitate routine treatment of tobacco dependence in a relatively short timeframe. Implementing best practices like these, including increased emphasis on the implementation and use of electronic health record systems and healthcare quality measures, is increasingly important given the changing health care environment. Lessons learned from this project can be resources for states and health systems likely to implement similar systems changes.

Highlights

  • Health systems play key roles in identifying tobacco users and providing evidence-based care to help them quit

  • Data demonstrate that treating tobacco use leads to higher patient satisfaction [4], improved patient health [5] and a positive return on investment [6], making treating tobacco use an ideal target for health care systems change efforts

  • Capitalize on existing quality improvement initiatives Respecting competing priorities and taking advantage of existing initiatives can help raise the priority of tobacco dependence treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health systems play key roles in identifying tobacco users and providing evidence-based care to help them quit. Health systems change – changes to health care processes, policies and financing – has potential to build capacity within these systems to address tobacco use. Health care systems changes – changes to health care processes, policies and financing – can result in tobacco use being addressed routinely with all patients in an ongoing, sustainable manner [7]. Using electronic health records (EHRs) for tobacco user identification and subsequent interventions increases delivery of evidence-based care [12,13]. As the health care environment moves toward widespread adoption of EHRs, and payers are providing financial incentives for their adoption and use (e.g., Meaningful Use), there is a growing potential to integrate evidence-based tobacco dependence treatment into existing health care. We examine factors that influenced health systems’ ability to implement systems changes, including making changes with their EHRs

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call