Abstract

Systemic administration of ovine prolactin (PRL) has been previously reported to stimulate parental feeding behavior toward 7-day-old foster squabs by nonbreeding ring doves with previous breeding experience. The first of the present experiments reexamined this claim in experienced, nonbreeding birds given test squabs of different ages. Each visually isolated male and female dove was given twice-daily subcutaneous injections of ovine PRL or vehicle for 7 days and then tested for parental responses toward a single 1–3, 6–8, or 11- to 13-day-old foster squab. Prolactin significantly increased the incidence or frequency of parental regurgitation-feeding episodes in tests with all three squab age groups and, in addition, increased the incidence of parental feeding invitations (squab-oriented bill openings) in tests with 6- to 8-day-old squabs. A second study explored the degree to which PRL can act directly on the central nervous system to facilitate parental activity in the absence of peripheral cues generated from PRL-induced changes in other target organs, such as those associated with crop sac growth and distension. In this experiment, 6- to 8-day-old test squabs were used to determine if parental behavior is enhanced by twice-daily intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of PRL in doses below those required to stimulate peripheral target organs. Injection schedules and behavior testing procedures were the same as those used in Experiment 1. However, half of the ICV PRL-treated and ICV vehicle-treated birds were food deprived for 16 hr before and during the test in order to control for PRL-induced hyperphagia and resulting crop sac distension, which could confound the results by generating peripheral stimuli conducive to the display of regurgitation-feeding behavior. Intracranial injections of prolactin significantly increased the incidence of feeding behavior, parental feeding invitations, and crouching or sitting in the nest in food-deprived doves but not in freely fed animals. Empty crop sac weights of freely fed and food-deprived PRL-treated birds were not increased above control values, thus indicating that ICV PRL treatment did not result in significant stimulation of peripheral target organs. These results demonstrate a facilitative action of PRL on regurgitation-feeding responses and associated parental behaviors that is not restricted to squabs of one particular age range. They also indicate that PRL is capable of acting directly on the brain to promote these activities in the absence of PRL-induced changes in the crop sac and other peripheral target organs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call