Abstract

What role does the presence of facial speech play for children with dyslexia? Current literature proposes two distinctive claims. One claim states that children with dyslexia make less use of visual information from the mouth during speech processing due to a deficit in recruitment of audiovisual areas. An opposing claim suggests that children with dyslexia are in fact reliant on such information in order to compensate for auditory/phonological impairments. The current paper aims at directly testing these contrasting hypotheses (here referred to as “mouth insensitivity” versus “mouth reliance”) in school-age children with and without dyslexia, matched on age and listening comprehension. Using eye tracking, in Study 1, we examined how children look at the mouth across conditions varying in speech processing demands. The results did not indicate significant group differences in looking at the mouth. However, correlation analyses suggest potentially important distinctions within the dyslexia group: those children with dyslexia who are better readers attended more to the mouth while presented with a person’s face in a phonologically demanding condition. In Study 2, we examined whether the presence of facial speech cues is functionally beneficial when a child is encoding written words. The results indicated lack of overall group differences on the task, although those with less severe reading problems in the dyslexia group were more accurate when reading words that were presented with articulatory facial speech cues. Collectively, our results suggest that children with dyslexia differ in their “mouth reliance” versus “mouth insensitivity,” a profile that seems to be related to the severity of their reading problems.

Highlights

  • Developmental dyslexia refers to behaviorally defined difficulties in developing fluent and accurate word decoding which cannot be attributed to either low mental or chronological age or sensory-neurological disorders (American Psychological Association, 2013; Lyon, 1995; Snowling et al, 2020; Vellutino et al, 2004)

  • The two groups were matched on listening comprehension, with both groups, on average, scoring within the age-adequate range according to population norms

  • As a group, the DYS readers displayed the pattern of poor word/nonword reading, poor phonological processing, but typical listening comprehension, which is typical for individuals receiving a dyslexia diagnosis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developmental dyslexia refers to behaviorally defined difficulties in developing fluent and accurate word decoding which cannot be attributed to either low mental or chronological age or sensory-neurological disorders (American Psychological Association, 2013; Lyon, 1995; Snowling et al, 2020; Vellutino et al, 2004). Contrary to Schaadt et al (2019), one study (Pekkola et al, 2006) reported an increase rather than a reduction in activation of brain areas presumed to support speech in a dyslexic group when watching a movie of a person whose mouth movements did not correspond to heard auditory input This activation co-varied with phonological processing abilities (worse phonological processing corresponded to increased activation), interpreted as reflecting “dyslexic readers heightened reliance on motor-articulatory and visual speech processing strategies, possibly as a compensatory mechanism to overcome linguistic perceptual difficulties” We presented school children, with and without diagnosed dyslexia, a video of a female speaker who was silent (silent face condition), telling short stories (ordinary speech condition), and was pronouncing nonsense words that the participants were instructed to repeat (nonword repetition condition) Across these three conditions, gaze patterns toward the mouth were calculated to determine dyslexic participants’ reliance on the mouth compared to a nondyslexic group that were matched on age and listening comprehension. In considering several studies (de Gelder & Vroomen, 1998; Schaadt et al, 2016; Schaadt et al, 2019) that report associations between reading-related skills presumed to reflect facial speech processing, we will examine associations between reading-related measures and proportion of looking at the mouth within each group

Method
Participants
Results and discussion
Participants and ethics
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call