Abstract

Facial folds and creases are established descriptive anatomical terms for structures of which the morphological characteristics and origins are not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to perform a morphological investigation of the nasolabial fold (NLF), mandibular fold (MF), deep transverse forehead (DTFC), infraorbital fold (IOF) and upper eyelid fold (UEF), correlating their phenotypes to differences in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), noting morphological differences and similarities. Full‐graft tissue blocks of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and mimic muscles collected postmortem were studied histologically. Serial histological sections were stained with Azan. Location‐ and composition‐specific morphological differences were determined. Histological serial section digitalization and three‐dimensional reconstruction of the tissue blocks were performed. Three different types of SMAS architecture were identified. Type I SMAS consisted of parallel‐aligned fibrous septa connecting the mimic muscles to the skin that covered the cheek, infraorbital and supraorbital, and forehead areas. Type II SMAS morphology appeared as a condensed Type I SMAS architecture with stronger fibrous septa and smaller fatty tissue compartments covering the lower and upper lip areas. Type III SMAS consisted of loose connective tissue covering the lower and upper eyelid regions. NLF, MF, IOF, and UEF are habitual primary folds induced by morphological changes in the underlying SMAS architecture. The secondary, accidental creases (DTFC) are cutaneous depressions derived from interacting dermal‐skeletal‐muscular changes without SMAS structure changes. The upper and lower eyelid wrinkles were tertiary, age‐related undulating skin redundancy formations. Clin. Anat. 32:573–584, 2019. © 2019 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists.

Highlights

  • Musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) defined a subcutaneous spreading musculoaponeurotic-adipose layer covering the face with regional morphological differences probably related to nasolabial fold (NLF) development (Sandulescu et al 2018a, 2018b, 2018c)

  • The NLF and mandibular fold (MF) marked the transition between the cheek and the upper lip and lower lip regions, respectively, while the infraorbital fold (IOF) and upper eyelid fold (UEF) bordered the lower and upper eyelids from the infraorbital and supraorbital regions, respectively

  • The deep transverse forehead crease (DTFC) was identified as a prominent cutaneous depression horizontally covering the forehead area

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Facial surface topography has important meaning for all clinicians, medical students, and (increasingly) medical and forensic artists, anthropologists, and even lawyers (Dunn and Harrison 1997). Because Latin terminology has been avoided in clinical practice, and because of the International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee agreement regarding translation from the vernacular, uniform nomenclature has been lost (Dunn and Harrison 1997; Fabry et al 2006). Despite these histomorphological findings, the lack of uniform terminology has caused three different nomenclatures,

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call