Abstract

Psychopathy continues to be a challenge in forensic contexts, and evidence of its association with destructive behaviors, such as aggressive antisocial behaviors, is extensive. However, the potential role of intelligence as moderator of the well-established association between psychopathy and aggressive antisocial behaviors has largely been neglected, despite intelligence having been independently related to both concepts. Increased knowledge of whether intelligence is relevant to this association is needed because of its possible implications on the assessment and treatment of individuals with psychopathic traits and aggressive antisocial behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the association between psychopathic traits, aggressive antisocial behaviors, and intelligence in young violent offenders and to test whether intelligence moderates the relationship between psychopathic traits and aggressive antisocial behaviors. Participants were 269 male violent offenders aged 18–25 years, assessed on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), the Life History of Aggression (LHA), and the General Ability Index from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edition. Associations were tested with Spearman’s rho, and moderation analysis was performed through ordinary least squares regressions. The PCL-R four-facet structure was used for the analyses. We found a positive association between psychopathic traits and aggressive antisocial behaviors, and a small negative association between the Affective PCL-R facet and intelligence. In the moderation analyses, a small yet statistically significant moderation effect of intelligence on the association between the Interpersonal facet and LHA total scores was demonstrated. However, the amount of variance in the LHA total score explained by the model was very small: 2.9%. We suggest that intelligence, however, important for rehabilitation strategies and everyday functioning, is not necessarily pertinent to understanding aggressive antisocial behaviors in young offenders with psychopathic traits.

Highlights

  • People with highly psychopathic traits are a resource-intensive group in the criminal justice system, and they often return to crime despite extensive rehabilitative efforts (Rice and Harris, 2013)

  • The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the relationship between psychopathic traits and aggressive antisocial behaviors is moderated by intelligence in a well-described, nationally representative cohort of young violent offenders in Sweden, with the following specific research questions: (1) Which associations can be found between psychopathic traits, aggressive antisocial behaviors, and intelligence? and (2) Does intelligence moderate the relationship between psychopathic traits and aggressive antisocial behaviors?

  • The aims were to identify associations between the four facets of psychopathy according to the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), aggressive antisocial behaviors according to the Life History of Aggression (LHA), and intelligence as measured by the WAIS-III General Ability Index (GAI), and to test whether intelligence moderated the associations between psychopathic traits and aggressive antisocial behaviors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People with highly psychopathic traits are a resource-intensive group in the criminal justice system, and they often return to crime despite extensive rehabilitative efforts (Rice and Harris, 2013). Taken together as a construct, these interpersonal, affective, and behavioral characteristics make this a unique group for the criminal justice and healthcare systems to deal with (Hare, 2003; Shaw and Porter, 2012). People with highly psychopathic traits commit more than 50% of the most serious crimes (Hare et al, 1993; Hare, 1999) and display high rates of criminal versatility (Kosson et al, 1990; Shaw and Porter, 2012). The debate continues about whether antisocial behaviors are a core component of the construct (Hare and Neumann, 2010; Neumann et al, 2015) or a consequence (Skeem and Cooke, 2010a,b) and what features are integral to the construct (Lilienfeld et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call