Abstract

In this study, we examined the beam-irradiation effect on the structural evolution of the grain boundary (GB) in a Cu bicrystal at room temperature using a Cs-corrected, monochromated transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 300 keV. Faceting of the GB was observed at a low current density of the electron beam. With increasing current density, the GB became defaceted. The faceting–roughening transition was shown to be reversible, as the process was reversed upon decreasing the current density. The structural transition is explained by inelastic scattering effects by electron-beam irradiation.

Highlights

  • In this study, we examined the beam-irradiation effect on the structural evolution of the grain boundary (GB) in a Cu bicrystal at room temperature using a ­Cs-corrected, monochromated transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 300 keV

  • We show that electron-beam irradiation in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) caused GB migration and a GB structural transition

  • At a diameter of 25 nm (815 A ­cm–2) (Fig. 3), the GB was faceted into two components, (0 1 0)//(1 –1 0) and {1 1 1}, and migrated from [1 0 0] to [1 1 0], as observed at the lower current density (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We examined the beam-irradiation effect on the structural evolution of the grain boundary (GB) in a Cu bicrystal at room temperature using a ­Cs-corrected, monochromated transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 300 keV. Merkle and ­Thompson[6] examined the GB in an Au bicrystal composed of [0 0 1] and [0 1 1] grains at a TEM operated at 400 keV at a current density of ~ 5 A c­ m–2. They observed that the GB was atomically sharp and migrated from the [0 0 1] grain into the [0 1 1] grain by the propagation of atomic steps. When the rough GB at the higher current density was subjected to a lower current density, it returned to a faceted structure composed of the two GB facets These results indicate that the faceting–roughening GB transition under electron-beam irradiation was reversible. The illumination area was changed by spreading or contracting the beam by adjusting the C2 lens

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.