Abstract

Face perception is a vital part of human social interactions. The social value of faces makes their efficient detection evolutionarily advantageous. It has been suggested that this might occur nonconsciously, but experimental results are equivocal thus far. Here, we probe nonconscious face perception using a novel combination of binocular rivalry with continuous flash suppression and steady-state visually evoked potentials. In the first two experiments, participants viewed either non-face objects, neutral faces (Study 1), or fearful faces (Study 2). Consistent with the hypothesis that faces are processed nonconsciously, we found that faces broke through suppression faster than objects. We did not, however, observe a concomitant face-selective steady-state visually evoked potential. Study 3 was run to reconcile this paradox. We hypothesized that the faster breakthrough time was due to a mid-level visual feature, curvilinearity, rather than high-level category membership, which would explain the behavioral difference without neural evidence of face-selective processing. We tested this hypothesis by presenting participants with four different groups of stimuli outside of conscious awareness: rectilinear objects (e.g., chessboard), curvilinear objects (e.g., dartboard), faces, and objects that were not dominantly curvilinear or rectilinear. We found that faces and curvilinear objects broke through suppression faster than objects and rectilinear objects. Moreover, there was no difference between faces and curvilinear objects. These results support our hypothesis that the observed behavioral advantage for faces is due to their curvilinearity, rather than category membership.

Highlights

  • Across all participants (N=25) the breakthrough time during continuous flash suppression was significantly faster than the full run duration (Mdiff = 12.59 s, SD = 12.06; Figure 2)

  • This was true even when we restricted the analysis to include only the subset of participants who were included in the state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) analysis (Mdiff = 8.55 s, SD = 9.21); t(18) = 4.05, p

  • For the neuFace-no CFS (noCFS) condition (M = .328 μV, SD = .24) we found extreme evidence (BF = 3736) that the observed data are more likely under H1 (d > 0) than under H0 (d = 0)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Faces are considered to be a special category of visual stimuli. In this view, the social and behavioral importance of these ubiquitous stimuli created an evolutionary pressure that resulted in sensory-cognitive processes and neural machinery specialized for face perception. Are faces vulnerable to this superficial treatment by the visual system, or does their evolutionary importance result in more complete processing even when presented outside of awareness? One approach to investigating nonconscious processing relies on the interocular suppression that occurs when each eye views a different image (binocular rivalry). Continuous flash suppression (CFS) is a type of binocular rivalry paradigm that extends the potential duration of the suppression from seconds to minutes (Tsuchiya & Koch, 2005).

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.